Action Research

Think Through Math
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investigating the Effectiveness of Think Through Math


In this action research project I investigated the effectiveness of the state funded intervention math program Think Through Math.  Think Through Math is a web based adaptive math program designed to personalize instruction and close learning gaps in students.   To measure the effectiveness of the program I looked at the following data points:

  • Middle of the Year I Benchmark Scores
  • Middle of the Year II Benchmark Scores
  • Think Through Math Usage Reports

I researched the suggested usage guidelines for Think Through Math.  According to their research to increase student performance students should complete at least 5 lessons per month or 2 -3 lessons per week and work in the program 45 minutes per week.  I looked at campus usage reports for September thru April and zeroed in the campuses that averaged around 40 lessons (5 lessons x 8 months).  I then zoomed in farther and discovered which teachers, classes, and/or grade levels on these campuses averaged the highest number of lessons completed.  From here I found the district benchmark data for each of these teachers, classes, and/or grade levels.  I compared the Middle of the Year benchmark I to the Middle of the Year benchmark II to see if there was growth in student performance.  On average student performance between the benchmarks increased by 9 points in these classes/grade levels with the highest number of completed lessons.

These findings are important to the district because we encourage teachers to use the program and it is state funded.  A lot of time is spent setting up teacher and student accounts, providing professional development, and supporting teachers on campuses with the program.  This research was important to Lamar Middle School because our schedule provides during the school-day Tier II intervention by double-blocking students who did not meet standard on 2014 STAAR for math.  Additional time in math would not benefit these students if they are missing concepts due to a learning gap from a previous year.  Think Through Math provided a placement test and determined a personal learning path for each student to help close these learning gaps.  This was beneficial to our teachers because they did not have to make extra lesson plans for these students and the program provided task differentiation during the 90 minute block.


Next year, I’d like to compare a school that does not use the program and a school that uses the program regularly.  Also from my teacher survey I realized some teachers need more support and training on how the different types of problems are solved, i.e. pull-down menus, drag-n-drop, and etc.  I plan to provide a classroom model of how to implement the program in different settings; 45 minute classes, 90 minute block, after-school, and Saturday school.